This page contains an overview of NC State’s efforts and of PreMiEr’s Social and Ethical Implications (SEI) research focus. Visit the full PreMiEr website to learn more.


PreMiEr will develop an integrated framework that advances microbiome technologies and enables the bioinformed design of smart and healthy built environments.

The Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr) is a National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Engineering Research Center (ERC) (Award # 2133504) led by Duke University in collaboration with NC State University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NC A&T), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC-Charlotte), as well as members of industry and other educational institutions.

PreMiEr is funded by a five-year, $26 million grant, renewable for a second five-year, $26 million term.


PreMiEr’s vision is to develop an integrated framework for enabling the development of high impact microbiome technologies that provide innovative solutions to key societal challenges at the interface of human health and the built environment. In particular, PreMiEr will advance microbiome technologies by developing diagnostic tools and engineering approaches that lead to the prevention of infectious agents’ colonization and the promotion of beneficial microorganisms in the built environment.


Researchers in PreMiEr will achieve their goals through cross-disciplinary efforts using the latest technologies in genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic technologies to study the microbial “dark matter” that colonizes the built environment, develop sensors and other technologies to monitor and modify those communities, and create sophisticated computer models to help predict the outcomes of changes to the built environment microbiome and drive beneficial health outcomes.


PreMiEr seeks to help identify not only what might make a built environment microbiome harmful to inhabitants, but also hopes to identify organisms, metabolites, or other factors that lead to positive health outcomes. Our ultimate goal is to create biologically safe indoor spaces for everyone. The findings of this center could ultimately lead to recommendations for building design, construction, or operation in order to promote the proliferation of healthy microorganisms in man-made structures.

Back to top

MoBE Workshop

MoBE – Workshop on the Societal and Ethical Implications of Microbiome Engineering in Built Environments

May 15 @ 9:00 am – 5:00 pm
Talley Student Union, Room 3222

This workshop is hosted by the GES Center at NC State and funded by the NSF Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr) research grant.
Wednesday, May 15: Speakers to discuss the State of MoBE Science and Engineering; Social Equity; Bioethics; Risk Governance; Public Perception and Community Engagement; and Integration of SEI with Science and Engineering of the Microbiome | Thursday, May 16: Presentation of case studies and deliberative discussions


Watch our video, produced by Duke Engineering and originally posted on YouTube, to learn more >

Back to top

Research Areas

Research Thrust 1 (RT1) combines multi-omic investigations to determine the mechanisms of microbial colonization and aims to develop sensor and tracking technologies for diagnosing built environment health at varying resolutions (i.e., personal, room, and building level).

RT1 researchers will develop tracking tools that combine phylogenetic and functional aspects through the integration of personal and environmental microbiome data with microbial dark matter characteristics. These tools will include genome-enabled approaches that can target uncultivated microbial taxa and increase our understanding of microbial diversity, phylogenetic relationships, metabolic capabilities, and interactions in the built environment as well as functional approaches via meta-omics. In combination, these approaches will deepen our databases enabling the identification of key molecules and the development of sensors for health assessment of the built environment.

Projects in RT1 will apply and expand fundamental knowledge in microbiome monitoring. We will begin by developing approaches for monitoring and connecting the personal and the environmental microbiome as well as determine functional signatures that can diagnose built environment health. RT1 data will provide the early building blocks for monitoring the built environment microbiome as well that of its occupants, identifying the biomarkers that signal a healthy built environment, and inform PreMiEr’s future sensor development work.

Projects in Research Thrust 2 (RT2) will build the toolbox needed for targeting the delivery/removal of desired genetic features or vectors in the built environment as well as enabling functional modulation in an established microbial community.

RT2 researchers will use their knowledge of delivery systems and nanoparticle transport in complex environments to develop the requisite toolbox for microbiome engineering in the built environment. Initial projects will focus on limiting the spread of animicrobial resistance (AMR) in built microbiomes as well as targeting the built environment water microbiome as there is a critical body of work linking the microbiome of premise plumbing to adverse effects in the built environment. Later efforts will transition to engineering solutions to limiting pathogens and bioaerosols as PreMiEr’s research matures.

Projects in Research Thrust 3 (RT3) will develop predictive models that incorporate spatiotemporal methods, generative modeling concepts, and machine learning approaches to analyze built environment microbiomes.

RT3 projects will focus on the development of predictive models that identify factors that contribute to microbiome compositional variations, and microbiome signatures that associate with specific health outcomes, which in turn will inform built environment health signature identification.

Initial projects will focus on various facets of the predictive models using existing large datasets and then incorporate PreMiEr datasets from Research Thrust 1 as those are generated. Spatial-temporal statistical models for microbiome compositions will be constructed that can characterize the personalized equilibrium of an individual’s microbiome compositions and detect anomalies, or deviation from the normal equilibrium. This information will be crucial in linking to the environmental microbiome. Another project will integrate functional information to decipher the functional meanings of the signals identified in the predictive models. Finally, improvements in the bioinformatic preprocessing pipelines using machine learning approaches will enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the predictive models.

In Research Core A, PreMiEr’s microbiome tracking devices (personal and environmental sensors), targeted delivery tools and predictive microbiome modeling framework will be integrated to measure, predict and improve the health of the built environment microbiome in six model testbed environments:

  1. Environmental Chambers
  2. Artificial Gut
  3. Tiny House
  4. Duke University Smart Home
  5. Hospitals, and
  6. Bolivian Homes

The PreMiEr Data Analytics Core is an integral part of the success of the ERC by supporting the hardware and software needs of all other research thrusts. Its goals can be broken down into three main areas.

1. A seamless, central repository with core services providing

  • Scientific data processing and analysis support
  • Report and figure creation services
  • Seamless and automated ability to start and modify processes and analyses

2. Ensuring transparency and reproducibility

  • Eliminate “silos” of data
  • Allow teams to easily work together
  • Publish results that fully expose the processing pipeline and publish virtualized containers
  • Support version control

3. Being “hardware agnostic”

  • Allow any PreMiEr researcher (or other interested scientist) to faithfully reproduce analyses regardless of hardware
  • Provide virtualized containers for on-campus and other systems, including a primary system at UNC-Charlotte, the ViCAR system at North Carolina A&T, and the cloud

All research and activities within PreMiEr are guided and done in collaboration with the Societal and Ethical Implications (SEI) Core.

PreMiEr’s work evokes a diverse range of SEI issues at the intersection of health and environmental risk, medical ethics, research ethics, environmental release of GMOs, public trust and perceptions, social equity, gender and racial inequities, privacy and regulation, and responsible governance.

PreMiEr provides a unique opportunity to engage researchers, engineers, stakeholders, and publics in emerging conversations about engineered microbiomes in built environments

The ERC also enables novel and ground-breaking scholarly examination of SEI aspects of microbiome engineering for built environments

Diversity and Culture of Inclusion Overview
PreMiEr prioritizes diversity and culture of inclusion (DCI) recognizing that our ERC cannot maximize impacts without intentional efforts to foster both and promote an equitable environment where all can thrive. PreMiEr grew out of an existing 5-year partnership between Duke (HWI) and North Carolina A&T (HBCU). This partnership taught both universities lessons on the practical implementation of diversity and culture of inclusion. The addition of North Carolina State (NC State), UNC Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), and UNC Charlotte (UNC-C) to this team has provided us with an even greater opportunity to institutionalize DCI in every aspect of PreMiEr’s function.

PreMiEr is dedicated to building a diverse faculty and trainee population as a means to broaden participation in STEM. This will be achieved by leveraging recruitment of underserved populations across all campuses and working to develop research pipelines between Duke, UNC-CH, UNC-C, NCSU and NCAT. We see the key to this effort stemming from PreMiEr advancing a bold and reimagined research agenda that not only benefits the historically privileged but also addresses the needs of historically marginalized communities. We recognize that while diversity is known to impact creativity by fueling innovation, diversity without an inclusive culture and equitable framework can significantly limit creativity and decrease participants’ commitment levels. Thus, our primary goal is to develop an inclusive and equitable culture where voices from diverse stakeholders are acknowledged and all participants are treated with respect and their ideas evaluated with the highest standards of scientific integrity.

PreMiEr’s commitment to DCI is evidenced by the composition of our ERC. Our leadership team is composed of 60% females and 20% URM faculty, while our senior personnel is composed of 43.6% females and 12.8% faculty from racially marginalized communities. We are committed to promoting an equitable academic and social environment where minority scholars can flourish. This will be achieved through leadership development for ERC leaders/mentors including effective communication strategies, fostering a thriving & engaging environment, and promoting an inclusive environment; and 3) feedback from PreMiEr’s advisory boards to our Executive and Steering Committees.

The four Diversity and Culture of Inclusion goals are to:

  1. Continue to prioritize and increase diversity, equity and inclusion across PreMiEr’s institutional ecosystem
  2. Promote an equitable academic and social environment where minority scholars can flourish
  3. Prioritize the recruitment and retention of diverse trainees
  4. Broaden participation in microbiome sciences

Award Abstract # 2133504: NSF Engineering Research Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr)

Microbes have colonized and adapted to most every environment on Earth, including the built environments that humans have created, such as the homes where we live and the pipes that bring us drinking water. It has been well established that microbial communities, or microbiomes, that colonize people have a direct influence on human health. The microbiome of the built environment, in particular, has gained increasing recognition for its key role in human health through its interaction with the human microbiome. However, despite this knowledge, no systematic infrastructure exists to decipher how microbial systems adapt to and grow within built environments, impeding our ability to diagnose built environment health and harness the power inherent to those microbiomes.

The Engineering Research Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr) will create microbiome-based diagnostic tools and develop microbiome engineering approaches to monitor and operate built environments that maximize human health protection. Informed by societal needs and research-stakeholder teams, PreMiEr’s research design will work to prevent the spread of infectious agents, promote the colonization of beneficial microorganisms, and lead to strategies for controlling pandemics and antibiotic resistance—phenomena that have led to over six million deaths worldwide (as of June 2022) and cost the global economy an estimated $8 trillion in the last year alone. Integral to its research vision, PreMiEr will create diverse and inclusive interdisciplinary research and training hubs where engineers, microbiologists, social scientists, and ethicists work alongside theorists, model builders, and computational scientists to develop technologies that enable transformative engineering discoveries in safe, sustainable and responsible ways.

Our capacity to engineer microbiomes requires a fundamental understanding of concepts of community ecology and an ability to track, control, and model those interactions. To apply microbiome engineering to real-world systems, community level interactions must be integrated into a comprehensive, scalable modeling framework that requires iterative evaluation and validation in model testbeds. PreMiEr’s research organization is designed to generate fundamental understanding across these levels and functionalities, culminating in the development of a framework that enables the biodesign of smart and healthy built environments. PreMiEr will leverage advances in high-throughput genomic sequencing, high-resolution mass spectrometry, computational performance, and statistical modeling to unravel previously unknown mechanistic interactions. Enabling technologies will be developed to detect and define interactions in the built environment, including approaches that probe microbial dark matter for the development of built-environment health diagnostic tools; methods for targeted delivery of desired genetic features and microbial vectors; tools for fine in situ functional tuning; and predictive scalable statistical microbiome engineering models that consider high dimensionality, sparsity, and heterogeneity. These new technology elements will enable us to test hypotheses related to microbiome assembly and function.

Importantly, by incorporating social scientists and ethicists into PreMiEr’s research framework, non-social scientists’ work will be informed by consideration of the ethical, societal, and policy implications of their microbiome engineering discoveries. Through rigorous evaluation and iterative refinement of curricula, and institutional practices designed to support a culture of convergence and the dissemination of findings, PreMiEr will contribute to best practices in domestic training. The PreMiEr ERC will include targeted recruitment of trainees from underrepresented groups, building upon existing partnerships with our nation’s largest HBCU, and will provide immersion in research and training at the interface of multiple disciplines to address complex challenges. PreMiEr will train the next generation of diverse and highly motivated engineers and scientists in technical and professional skills to compete in the emerging arenas of microbial science and engineering. Ultimately, our work will advance collaborations and discovery focused on environmental microbiomes to engineer healthy built environments.

Back to top

Recommended Publications

SEI and Microbiomes Research

ArticleYearSignificanceKeywordsArticle image
Hardwick, A., Cummings, C., Graves, J. and Kuzma, J. Can societal and ethical implications of precision microbiome engineering be applied to the built environment? A systematic review of the literature. Environ Syst Decis (2024). SharedIt Open-Access link: Graphic2024This article, written by the Societal and Ethical Implications (SEI) team of the NSF Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr) Engineering Research Center, is the first systematic review of the SEI literature on the microbiome. As research about the microbiome of the built environment (MoBE) grows, it will be needed to adapt the lessons taken from studying microbiomes in general and apply them to the built environment. These lessons will enable more ethical research of the built environment and the development of applications that better consider different societal views about MoBE engineering.Microbiome, Built environment, Societal and ethical implications, Systematic review, PreMiErCan societal and ethical implications of precision microbiome engineering be applied to the built environment? A systematic review of the literature
Mohorčich J, Reese J. Cell-cultured meat: Lessons from GMO adoption and resistance. Appetite. 2019 Dec 1;143:104408. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104408. PDF2019Featured article for May 10 PreMiEr SEI Journal Club will be a discussion of the article, "Cell-cultured meat: Lessons from GMO adoption and resistance," facilitated by Ivory Blakely, a research assistant at UNC Charlotte. 

Though PreMiEr's focus isn't on the food industry, the lessons derived from this exploration of biological engineering technologies have broader implications that resonate with our work.

Our discussion leader, while not an expert on this topic, brings a fresh perspective to the table, stimulating conversation that encourages learning and discovery for all participants. We are particularly keen on benefiting from the insights of experts like Dr. Kuzma, who can shed light on the complex dynamics surrounding genetically engineered food and how we might navigate potential challenges in our own engineering endeavors. Additionally, we may draw parallels from public opinion studies on water fluoridation.

If you're pressed for time, we recommend focusing on Section 4 of the article, which details results and recommendations. Remember, reading the article is optional - the discussion is the main event. 

Cell-cultured meat, GMO adoption, Technology adoption, Consumer activism, Supply chain pressure, Positive aspects vs. negative perceptionsFlavrSavr package
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. PDF2023Featured article for Apr. 19 PreMiEr SEI Journal Club facilitated by Andrew Hardwick on "Race as a "ghost" variable in microbiome research - continued".
Supplementary reading: Webinar | Consensus Study Report—HighlightsInteractive Overview

On April 19, the third SEI Journal Club took place, facilitated by Andrew Hardwick of NC State University. The session convened nine participants, from various universities affiliated with PreMiEr. The primary focus was a comprehensive review of the executive summary of the recent NASEM Report "Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field"

This seminal report provides 13 distinct recommendations concerning the use of population descriptors, such as race, genetic ancestry, genetic similarities, and genetic ancestry groups in genomic studies. Accompanying the recommendations is a tabular guide that delineates which population descriptors are applicable to different genomic studies.

The participants dedicated a significant portion of the discussion to the report's first recommendation, which asserts that researchers should abstain from using race as a proxy for human genetic variation. It further advises against attributing genetic ancestry group labels to individuals based on their race, regardless of whether it is self-identified.

A rigorous debate ensued on the applicability of this recommendation to microbiome studies, considering the inherent differences between the human microbiome and genome. The participants actively contemplated the appropriateness of utilizing race in microbiome studies beyond the scope of health disparities research. This debate underscored the necessity of determining the suitability of race as a descriptor in different human microbiome studies.

The Journal Club concluded with a consensus on the potential collaborative development of a policy paper by PreMiEr members. This paper would propose guidelines for the use of race and other similar population descriptors in microbiome research, thereby contributing significantly to the standardization and ethical conduct of such studies.
Race, Ghost Variables, Human Genetics, Population Descriptors, Racismnap-population descriptors cover
De Wolfe, T. J., Arefin, M. R., Benezra, A., & Rebolleda Gómez, M. (2021). Chasing Ghosts: Race, Racism, and the Future of Microbiome Research. MSystems, 6(5), e00604-21. PDF
2021Featured article for Mar. 15 PreMiEr SEI Journal Club facilitated by Joseph L. Graves, Jr. on "Race as a "ghost" variable in microbiome research".
Supplementary reading: Graves, Joseph L. Jr. “The Misguided History of Racial Medicine.” Nautilus, 27 Feb. 2023.

This article is a critique of how race is currently studied within microbiome research. In many cases, race is treated as an innate biological difference between people instead of a reflection of different discriminatory practices that affects people because of their race. The authors argue that when we treat race as something innately biological (a “ghost” variable”) we perpetuate myths about innate racial differences. Instead, the authors argue that we should treat race as a social construction and instead of studying race directly we should focus on the drivers that lead to racial differences like colonialism, capitalism, or environmental racism. This article is great for questioning the purpose of using different demographics in microbiome research
Antiracist, Ethnicity, Justice, Microbiome, Microbiota, Race, RacismWolfe2021 article image
Brody, J.G., Dunagan, S.C., Morello-Frosch, R. et al. Reporting individual results for biomonitoring and environmental exposures: lessons learned from environmental communication case studiesEnviron Health 13, 40 (2014). PDF2014Featured article for Feb. 15 PreMiEr SEI Journal Club facilitated by Joe Brown of UNC-CH on the "Ethics and responsibility in environmental exposure research". The session was well attended, with about 15 participants across PreMiEr institutions. The paper poses essential questions about – and offers practical guidance on – our responsibilities to communities and people participating in environmental exposure studies. Given our plans for conducting studies of microbiomes and specific health-relevant microbes in the spaces where people live, work, and play, the paper sparked a wide-ranging discussion about the responsible and ethical conduct of research and the transparency of that research to stakeholders. Discussants raised points about needing to involve communities in the conduct of research from the beginning (e.g., Community-Based Participatory Research), including about how results of research will be communicated back, by whom, and to whom. Credibility of the scientists and trust with community members are key: we note that working within and supporting existing networks of trusted individuals – rather than as outsiders, lacking strong partnerships – may be helpful, recognizing our limits in this essential work. We can and should work with our IRBs on responsible and ethical communication, and we should allocate dedicated time to this, including via engaging with scholars with deep expertise on these topics. Building this expertise within our teams will take time, including involving additional investigators. We acknowledge that many of the things we measure have unclear health relevance, with microbes detected via molecular methods exhibiting key differences from, say, toxic metals in drinking water. We further discussed how it is unlikely that there will be a one-size-fits-all approach here: all communities are different, and we discussed in particular how working in the Bolivia test bed may be very different from communities in the United States. Bioethics; Biomonitoring; Community-based participatory research; Exposure assessment; Health literacy Informed consent; Research ethics; Risk communicationBrody-2014-figure1
Robinson, J. M., et al. (2022). Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity. MSystems, 7(1), e01240-21. PDF2022This article provides seven broad themes for considering the importance of social equity in microbiome research. The twenty questions between these seven themes point to different issues in studying the connections between social equity and microbial exposure. This article is great for starting to think about the many different ways that differences in microbial exposure can either perpetuate or be a reflection of differences in outcomes among different social groups.Social equity, Microbial exposure, Indigenous health, Urban ecosystems, Food security, Policy, Community engagementRobinson2022 article image
Hawkins, A. K., & O’Doherty, K. C. (2011). “Who owns your poop?”: Insights regarding the intersection of human microbiome research and the ELSI aspects of biobanking and related studies. BMC Medical Genomics, 4, 72. PDF2011This article provides an overview of the potential ethical, social, and legal issues (ELSI) that come with the collection and study of a person’s microbiome. The development of and use of biobanks for microbiome research leads to four major categories of ELSI: privacy, consent, ownership, and return of research results. The authors provide six recommendations for managing ELSI in human microbiome research:
  1. Be mindful of and prevent novel or unanticipated discrimination.
  2. Be sensitive to socio-cultural and economic contexts among participants.
  3. Be prepared in advance to either withhold or disseminate information.
  4. Human microbiome data should be treated with the same safeguards as human genetic data.
  5. Raise awareness among researchers about the different ELSI associated with human microbiome research.
  6. Reconsider and give attention to who owns human waste.
This article is a great start for considering the rights and concerns of participants involved in human microbiome research.
Privacy, Consent, Biodata ownership, Governance, Justice, Return of resultsHawkins2011 article image

NC State PreMiEr Faculty

With backgrounds ranging from biomolecular engineering to fungal microbiomes, researchers from five NC State colleges are contributing their expertise to the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering.


photo of Jennifer Kuzma

Jennifer Kuzma

Dr. Kuzma is the Goodnight-NCGSK Foundation Distinguished Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Co-Director of the Genetic Engineering and Society Center, and a member of the Chancellor's Faculty Excellence Program

Yi-Hui Zhou

Dr. Zhou is an Associate Professor of Biological Sciences in the College of Sciences, Associate Member of the Department of Statistics, Associate Editor of Biostatistics, Associate Director of Outreach with the Bioinformatics Research Center, and a member of the Chancellor's Faculty Excellence Program

Benjamin Callahan

Dr. Callahan is an Assistant Professor of Microbiomes and Complex Microbial Communities in the Population Health and Pathobiology department of the College of Veterinary Medicine, a member of the Chancellor's Faculty Excellence Program, and is also affiliated with the Bioinformatics Research Center

Nathan Crook

Dr. Crook is an Assistant Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering in the College of Engineering, PI of the Crook Lab

Kevin Garcia

Dr. Garcia is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and PI of the Garcia Lab

Back to top


Social & Ethical Implications Team

PreMiEr’s third research core, focused on the social and ethical implications (SEI) of engineered microbiomes,  evokes a diverse range of issues at the intersection of health and environmental risk, medical ethics, research ethics, environmental release of genetically modified organisms, public trust and perceptions, social equity, gender and racial inequities, privacy and regulation, and responsible governance.Woven into all of PreMiEr’s research activities, this provides a unique opportunity to engage researchers, engineers, stakeholders, and publics in emerging conversations about engineered microbiomes in built environments. It will also enable novel and ground-breaking scholarly examination of the various SEI aspects of PreMiEr’s research activities.

word cloud including: public, health, risk, deployment, microbiome ethics, GMOs, research, trust, responsible

SEI Journal Club

photo of Jennifer Kuzma

Jennifer Kuzma | NC State

Dr. Kuzma is the Goodnight-NCGSK Foundation Distinguished Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Co-Director of the Genetic Engineering and Society Center, and a member of the Chancellor's Faculty Excellence Program.
Joe Graves

Joseph L. Graves, Jr. | NC A&T

Dr. Graves is a Professor of Biological Science at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University.
Joe Brown

Joe Brown | UNC-CH

Dr. Brown is an Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering in the Gillings School of Global Public Health at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Carter Clinton

Clinton CarterNC State

Dr. Carteris an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at NC State University
Kristen Landreville

Kristen Landreville | NC State

Dr. Landreville is a Senior Research Scholar at the Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center at NC State and leads social science and public engagement research for the SEI Core.
Chris Cummings

Christopher L. Cummings | NC State

Dr. Cummings serves as a Senior Research Fellow at the Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center at NC State and is the Founding Director of Decision Analytica, LLC.
Photo of Andrew Hardwick, Public Administration, Advisor - Jennifer Kuzma

Andrew Hardwick | NC State

Andrew is a PhD student in Public Administration, a Research Assistant at the Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center at NC State and a Fellow in Cohort 2 of the AgBioFEWS graduate training program.

Back to top

Responsible Research and Innovation

An interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view on the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products. (von Schomberg 2011)

Venn Diagram of PreMiEr Goals for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) 1. Ensure research and innovation (R&I) addresses societal challenges 2. Open R&I to all actors and at all levels 3. Align R&I with societal values, needs and expectations

Goals for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)

SEI Model and Principles: Reflexivity, Anticipation, Inclusion, Responsivity

SEI Model and Principles

SEI Action Plan & Projects

1) Collaborative Systems Mapping and Modeling—Convergence of Disciplines Across Team (Y1-Y5)

  • Societal aspects, market barriers, microbial risk analysis, governance
  • Integrated with Team Meetings of Innovation Accelerator, Test-Beds, and Innovation Ecosystem
  • Part of Student Training and Short Courses; REU (research experience for undergraduates) Projects; and SEI Annual Workshops
  • Provides Mechanisms and Framework for Iterative Feedback from Stakeholder and Public Engagement Projects to Research Thrusts, Cores and Innovation Accelerator

SEI Action Plan 1

2) Public Engagement for Inclusion of Diverse Voices

  • Draw on engagement infrastructure and experience of Core C partner centers
  • Deliberative workshops on SEI and educational demonstrations at community labs across U.S. (Y3-5)
  • Public dialogues and interviews of participants in and near Test Beds (Y2-5)
  • Specific inclusion of perspectives from underserved racial groups
  • Targeted inclusion of research participants (e.g. those with wearable devices)
  • Feedback to research and engineering team via Innovation Accelerator, Test Beds, Innovation Ecosystem, Research Thrusts, and other team meetings

Partner logos - UNC Center for Bioethics, GES Center NC State, Center for Genomics and Society, Genspace, biocurious, baltimore under ground science space, BioBlaze, The Community Lab (Biodidact Los Alamos, NM)

3) SEI Research and Deliberative Workshops

  • Engage SEI experts around U.S. and world (Y1-5)
  • National SEI Conferences (Y3 & 5)
    • Engage junior SEI scholars, natural scientists and engineers
    • Provide a network of professional development in RRI
    • Special edition of journals and policy forum outputs
  • SEI Expert Workshops (Y2 & 4)
    • Bring in SEI expertise in addition to Core C leadership
    • Additional risk analysts, legal scholars, economists, etc.
  • Focused Risk Assessment Track in each workshop
  • Become “premier” place for SEI scholarship and practice for microbiome engineering in built environments
  • Be a national policy voice for built environments and microbiome engineering

4) Assessing Public and Stakeholder Attitudes

  • Annual quantitative surveys with nationally representative group
  • In-depth interviews with stakeholders on innovation ecosystem, market forces, and regulation & governance
  • In-depth interviews with people in test bed areas on hopes, concerns, privacy and informed consent
  • Focus groups and deliberative events at community labs
  • Particular assessment of attitudes of historically marginalized groups
  • Feedback to research team and industry stakeholders in Innovation Accelerator, Test Beds, Research Thrusts and Innovation Ecosystem Core

Key Outcome

Enhance the success of microbiome technology within society and its integration in society in responsible, just, and inclusive ways.


Duke UniversityNC State UniversityNC A&TUNC Chapel HillUNC CharlotteNSF

Back to top

Contact Us

Back to top